It's one thing to believe in absolutes, another to believe absolutely.

2006-02-19

LOST LUGGAGE

Be Prepared
I usually shake my head in disgruntled fashion when I see fellow airline passengers allowed to maneuver large, so-called carry-on luggage through narrow isles, holding up others as they attempt (frequently without success) to weight-lift and shove it into overhead bins only to dislodge or scrunch and flatten hats, coats and other more reasonably-sized carry-on items.

But considering the lost-luggage statistics just released for 2005, I wonder whether I should stop checking in my luggage. Some 10,000 pieces of luggage a day were lost by airlines in 2005. While this is a sobering number, to be fair to airlines, this translates to fewer than 10 in 1,000 pieces, and most of them do find their way to owners eventually.

Well, I will at least make sure to think about which items I would not like to do without for a day or two on my next business trip, and pack them in my carry-on bag (for starters, my toothbrush, pillowcase cover, undies, socks... and picture of my family; I guess I'll have to purchase a wine bottle opener should the luggage get lost, as my trusty swiss army knife would be confiscated by the TSA).

2006-02-17

Anti-Smoking Sentiments Reaching Fever Pitch

VIOLATING THE RIGHTS OF NON-SMOKERS?!
Okay, I don't get it. Let me see, this is America, where the free-market approach rules, where personal freedoms are cherished, where alcohol and tobacco products are legal, where you can go have lunch at salad bars or at artery-clogging grease joints, where you can put your extra money into savings or spend it at slot machines knowing they are programmed against you.

Why in the world do Americans let politicians meddle in the free market, and disallow restaurants, bars, mom-and-pop establishments to make their own decisions about smoking in their premises? We do not need big government to waste time and law enforcement resources on prohibiting the use of a legal product when the free market is and has been perfectly capable of addressing that subject.

You can go to wine bars, biker bars, gay bars, strip joints if you like (or avoid them if you don't). If I don't like hanging out in places frequented by rednecks, or those with chains hanging from their nostrils, I don't have to. Thanks to the free market, there are public retail establishments fitting any taste and preference, including non-smoking bars and restaurants that have increasingly been springing up in response to a changing taste and market.

Just as jobseekers and patrons concerned about their moral health are not forced to apply to or frequent gay or strip bars, those concerned about smoke in the environment are free to go to smoke-free alternatives.

The enmity and discrimination in some circles and communities toward smokers is shocking, and reaching an irrational fever pitch. I have witnessed an encounter in which a man waiting outside a hotel lobby, with his car running spewing the usual stuff, utter derogatory and hateful comments toward a smoker standing by a trashcan.

What will come next? Will they be lined up or hauled off? WHO will be next? Will the auto industry be sued for knowingly selling product that spews carcinogens? Will second-hand car smoke (or the alluring smoke from hamburger joint chimneys) lead to law suits or communities outlawing cars (and hamburgers)? Will the consumption of full-fat ice cream or hot dogs within city limits be prohibited? After all, obesity is now known to be more costly to society than cigarettes. (I am a non-smoker.)

2006-02-03

THE REAL ENEMY IS RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY

CULTURE CLASH OVER CARTOONS

The anger of so-called Muslims who scream, burn flags, and threaten mayhem and murder in response to European cartoons depicting Islamic motifs in less than a respectful manner, rings completely hollow, and merely confirms the rest of the world's opinions about these people's inability to think, feel and act in a rational manner.

If they are truly concerned about upholding an image of Islam worthy of inspiring admiration and respect, they would exhibit an equally-intense-and-public outcry in response to terrorists shaming Mohammed by invoking Islam's name when murdering countless innocent fellow(!) Muslims.

Their murderous anger to the by-comparison harmless cartoon depiction of their prophet is misplaced, infantile or symptomatic of a greater and strategic evil to be resisted at all cost. I personally hope that it is infantile.

Do they really think that Mohammed or Allah would fall over dead with consternation when seeing cartoons of themselves, and so must be protected? Religious adherents who think of themselves and their religion too highly and beyond criticism (or even prohibit and punish dissent and questioning) are enemies of humanity.

Their evil starts with the ancient sin of pride that blinds them to the fact that humans are finite and limited in their understanding. The danger arises when in their embrace of religion, which tends toward absolute and ultimate claims (especially the monotheistic variety), they ignore these limitations and claim for themselves infallibility.

(Someone said: "It is one thing to believe in absolutes, another, to believe absolutely." G.K. Chesterton said: "It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong.")

The only way to be faithful and true to both our finiteness and to the religion we genuinely "feel right" about, is to proceed with humility. True religion (and its followers aware of fallibility) will invite and allow questions and doubt, and be unafraid of dissent and criticism. Humility is and essential mark of true religion as it takes into consideration the possibility of being wrong. The alternative is religious fundamentalism practiced by fanatics and bigots who defensively (and insecurely) insist that their view is the only right and correct one.

Fundamentalists can of course be found not only among Muslims but also among my fellow Christians. What does it reveal but prideful arrogance and an irrational desire to be and feel right, when in the name of upholding respect for their religion, prophet or God, Muslims threaten murder of the very creatures God has made?!

The Muslim world has a serious disadvantage in that too many of its religious leaders not only encourage an unquestioned faith that maintains the status quo (and their power), but also discourage their followers from thinking and fearlessly examining their religion and tradition.

The Western world's advantage in this arena is that its freedoms of religion and of the press make it nigh impossible to hold on (blindly) to unexamined beliefs. Caricatures, humor and political or religious cartoons, while at times stinging, keep us humble and mitigate human hubris, and should be welcomed by any intellectually honest and humble mind; cartoons do not kill, human pride does.

By demanding an apology from Western governments, Muslims are now dangerously escalating this to a clash between Islam and the West.